Home / Dualisms / Epiphenomenalism (Dualism)

Epiphenomenalism (Dualism)

Epiphenomenalism is considered a kind of dualism—specifically a type of property dualism—because it maintains a fundamental ontological distinction between mental and physical properties, even though all mental states are instantiated in physical states or generated by physical processes.

Photo of Several

Several

Several Theorists

Several theorists offer their theories.

Landscape

Key Takeaways

  • Core Claim

    Mental properties are real and non-physical but have no causal effect on the physical world.

  • How It Works

    Brain processes generate consciousness and qualia, but these mental states are purely byproducts without influence.

  • Distinguishing Idea

    Unlike most property dualism, mental states here are causally inert—like a steam whistle on a train.

  • Historical Shift

    Emerged as a retreat from full substance dualism when mental-to-physical causation lacked scientific evidence.

  • Challenges & Tensions

    Critics question why evolution would produce consciousness if it plays no causal role in survival or behavior.

Epiphenomenalism (Dualism)

Epiphenomenalism is considered a kind of dualism—specifically a type of property dualism—because it maintains a fundamental ontological distinction between mental and physical properties. Both epiphenomenalism and dualism hold that mental phenomena are not reducible to physical processes—because conscious experiences (qualia—e.g., the “redness” of red or the feeling of pain) are non-physical in nature. This sets epiphenomenalism apart from materialist or physicalist theories (like Identity Theory), which claim that mental states are just physical brain states. Thus, epiphenomenalism is a dualist view in that it affirms that there are at least two kinds of properties in the world: mental and physical.

Epiphenomenalism posits that mental properties—consciousness and qualia—are non-physical, irreducible to brain processes, and yet caused by them.

Definition and Distinctions

Epiphenomenalism is similar to Property Dualism and Non-Reductive Physicalism in that there is only one kind of substance, material/physical substance, and all mental states or properties are caused by physical processes, but epiphenomenalism differs from property dualism and non-reductive physicalism in that epiphenomenalism‘s mental states do not cause anything in return. According to David Chalmers, “Epiphenomenalism is a version of property dualism, and like all versions of property dualism, it holds that mental properties are distinct from, and not reducible to, physical properties” (Chalmers, 1996).

History and Critiques

Epiphenomenalism emerged from dualism as scientific advances made it harder to defend substance dualism with full mind-body interaction, due to the lack of observable causal effects of mental phenomena on the physical world. Epiphenomenalism seemed to be a kind of compromise: Keep the idea that conscious experience is non-physical. But concede that it doesn’t affect physical processes—i.e., it’s just a byproduct.

Thomas Henry Huxley famously compared consciousness to the steam whistle on a locomotive: “The steam-whistle which accompanies the work of a locomotive engine is without influence upon its machinery.”

Even though epiphenomenalism denies mental-to-physical causation, and does not allow substances other than material/physical ones, it still counts as a kind of dualism, because it affirms the existence of non-physical mental properties and their distinction from physical properties. This is sufficient for it to qualify as a kind of dualism, because dualism is about ontology (what kinds of things/properties exist), not necessarily about causation.

Epiphenomenalism is also classified under Materialism, because it takes only the physical to be real, only the material brain generates consciousness.

Tools

Share
El quote rightCite
Download PDF

Categories



References

Chalmers, 1996David Chalmers
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory
Oxford University Press
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-conscious-mind-9780195117899

References

Chalmers, 1996
David Chalmers
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory
1996
Oxford University Press
Google Scholar