Home / Quantum & Dimensions / King’s Symbiotic Existential Cosmology

King’s Symbiotic Existential Cosmology

‘Symbiotic Existential Cosmology’ is a biogenic, psycho-physical cosmology of conscious life in the universe. Subjective consciousness and the physical universe have an irreducible, asymmetric, complementary interactive relationship in which life is a biospherically symbiotic climax phenomenon in the mature universe. Interactivity is key to cosmology, affirming the ability of subjective consciousness to participate in causal intent and acausal anticipation through coupled, physically indeterminate phase transition states, which are seen as key to why subjective consciousness has been preserved by biological evolution over computational biology.

VerifiedVerified*
Photo of Chris King

Chris King

Mathematican & Psychedelicist

Chris King is an emeritus mathematician at the University of Auckland, with research interests in chaotic dynamical systems, biocosmology, neuroscience of consciousness, and music. A life involvement in natural psychedelics invigorates his Symbiotic Existential Cosmology. Website: https://dhushara.com/cossym/Symbiotic%20Cosmology.pdf.

*This summary was verified by Chris King on October 5, 2025.

Landscape

Key Takeaways

  • Core Thesis

    Subjective consciousness forms an irreducible, interactive complement to the physical universe, enabled by critical phase transition states in both brain dynamics and cosmology.

  • Protection of Evolving Life

    The climactic unfolding of Earth's biosphere is cosmologically sacrosanct—a privileged, protected outcome of universal evolution.

  • Paradigm Disruption

    This paradigm-shifting theory challenges scientific zeitgeist, asserting that subjective conscious agency provides a uniquely privileged window into the universe.

  • Key Principles

    Biocosmology: Conscious life is is a climax condition of cosmology, shaped by symmetry-breaking and the fractal, nonlinear dynamics of molecular interaction. Existence: The cosmos comprises subjective consciousness and the physical universe as complements—our only access to physical reality is through consciousness. Symbiosis: Despite individual selection, evolution is symbiotically cumulative; predators and parasites play essential roles in biospheric stability.

King’s Symbiotic Existential Cosmology

Mathematician and psychedelicist Chris King posits ‘Symbiotic Existential Cosmology’ as a biogenic, psycho-physical cosmology of conscious life in the universe (King, 2021). Subjective consciousness and the physical universe have an irreducible, asymmetric, complementary interactive relationship, in which life is a biospherically symbiotic climax phenomenon in the mature universe. Interactivity is key to cosmology, affirming the ability of subjective consciousness to participate in causal intent and acausal anticipation through coupled, physically indeterminate phase transition states, which are seen as key to why subjective consciousness has been preserved by biological evolution over computational biology.

Symbiotic Existential Cosmology

King’s central thesis asserts quantum-critical interaction, that subjective consciousness interacts with the physical brain, affecting the physical universe, through edge-of-chaos instabilities in conscious whole brain dynamics, accompanied by wave phase-modulation—in critical phase transition between full quantum entanglement and wave function collapse, in a universe also in phase transition and in biospheric evolutionary climax. Biological molecular processes do not approach classicality, because they do not involve independent identically distributed (IID) measurement, upon which the Born interpretation is founded. Subjective consciousness displays efficacy of volition over the physical universe, without causal conflict because the critical neurodynamic is quantum indeterminate. The universe consists of positive energy particles, whose absorption occurs in the future of their emission. Special relativistic quantum theory generates both retarded and advanced (retrocausal) solutions.

In the transactional approach, an emitter sends an offer wave, which future absorbers respond to with advanced confirmation waves (Cramer, 1986; Kastner, 2012). Wave collapse then corresponds to a critical phase transition from a ‘plasma’ of multiply interacting pairs to a ‘solid’ of real particles in a process providing a basis for conscious anticipation, conferring a survival advantage on the conscious organism, independent of computational prediction, selected for by evolution (King, 1989). Symmetry-breaking of the fundamental forces results in fractal edge-of-chaos molecular quantum interactions (King, 1978), leading to the complexity pathway, from macromolecules to organisms, confirming the standard model is both necessary and sufficient for conscious life. Active consciousness arose in the quantum sentience of single-celled eukaryotes due to the eukaryote endosymbiosis, sequestering respiration in the mitochondria, leaving the cell membrane free for edge-of-chaos excitability, sensitive to environmental fluctuations. Subjective consciousness thus spans the metazoa.

Scientific Evidence

King claims a multitude of scientific research supports his theory. Transitions from chaos are central to neurodynamics, including insight experiences, notable in the high correlation dimensions of resting state activity (Skarda & Freeman 1987). Active conscious states are asymptotic to the edge-of-chaos with noted parallels to quantum measurement in EEG wave beats (Toker et al., 2022; Pribram, 1991). Qasim et al. (2021) report phase tuning of handshaking between tissue potential waves and action potentials. Self-organized criticality is neurodynamically critical (Shriki et al., 2013; Fisher, 2015; O’Byrne & Jerbi, 2022; Beggs, 2023). Neural and quantum criticality leverage the same phenomena (Bettinger, 2017). Shine et al. (2018) demonstrate criticality in network integration and phase synchrony. Gallego and Dakić (2021) show that quantum theory is preserved in the macroscopic limit if correlations are not IID distributed. Chan et al. (2019), Li et al. (2018), and Skinner et al. (2019) demonstrate quantum entanglement in constellations of particles. Web or no web is akin to liquid and solid in the structure of information.

Irreducible Topological Transitions

Quantum wave-particle complementarity is an irreducible interactive topological relationship between continuous and discrete processes. Consciousness-universe complementarity—between the subdivisible quantum universe and the holistic stream of subjective consciousness—also has topological irreducibility. Kim (2001) characterizes consciousness and mental causation as a double topological world knot, after Schopenhauer’s ‘inexplicable’ Weltknoten—how the willing ‘I’ can be both the generator of the world of appearances it experiences and a particular being within that world, implying that primal subjectivity is foundational to cosmology.

These are bridged by two evolutionary topological transitions: the living cell, which forms a topological transformation of membrane electrochemistry, and the eukaryote endosymbiosis, in which respiratory electron transport became sequestered in the mitochondria, freeing the cell membrane for edge-of-chaos informational quantum sentience.

King concludes that primal subjectivity is manifest at the quantum level, with the wave function complementing “awareness” and wave collapse complementing “decision-making,” followed by encapsulated systems: quantum-sensitive butterfly effect systems, biogenic far-from-equilibrium systems, prokaryote life, and consciousness in eukaryotes.

Tools

Share
El quote rightCite
Download PDF


References

Beggs, 2023John Beggs
Bettinger, 2017Jesse Sterling Bettinger
Comparative approximations of criticality in a neural and quantum regime
Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 131:445-462
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.09.007
Chan & al., 2019A. Chan, et al.
Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics
arXiv:1808.05949
Cramer, 1986J. Cramer
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Rev. of Mod. Phys. 58(3) 647–688
Fisher, 2015Matthew Fisher
Quantum cognition: the possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain
Ann. Phys., 362, pp. 593-602
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2015.08.020
Gallego & Dakić, 2021M. Gallego, B. Dakić
Macroscopically Nonlocal Quantum Correlations
Phys. Rev Lett. 127, 120401
Kastner, 2012Ruth Kastner
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: The Reality of Possibility
Cambridge Univ. Pr.
Kim, 2001Jaegwon Kim
Mental Causation and Consciousness: The Two Mind-Body Problems for the Physicalist
In Physicalism and Its Discontents, edited by Carl Gillett and Barry Loewer, 271-283. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
https://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s7971.pdf
King, 1978C. King
Unified Field Theories and the Origin of Life
Ak. Univ. Math. Reps.
https://www.dhushara.com/cossym/UFT&OL150.pdf
King, 1989C. King
Dual-Time Supercausality
Physics. Essays 2/2 128-151.
King, 2021C. King
Symbiotic Existential Cosmology
ReearchGate [Preprint]
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10995.66082
Li, Chen & Fisher, 2018Yaodong Li, Xiao Chen, Matthew P. A. Fisher
Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition
Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.205136
O’Byrne & Jerbi, 2022J. O’Byrne, K. Jerbi
How critical is brain criticality?
Trends in Neurosciences 45/11
Pribram, 1991K. H. Pribram
Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Qasim, Fried & Jacobs, 2021Salman E. Qasim, Itzhak Fried, Joshua Jacobs
Phase precession in the human hippocampus and entorhinal cortex
Cell 184(12):3242-55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.017
Shine & al., 2018James M. Shine, et al.
The modulation of neural gain facilitates a transition between functional segregation and integration in the brain
eLife
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31130
Shriki & al., 2023Oren Shriki, et al.
Neuronal Avalanches in the Resting MEG of the Human Brain
Journal of Neuroscience, 33 (16) 7079-7090
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-12.2013
Skarda & Freeman, 1987C. Skarda, W. Freeman
How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 161-195
Skinner, Ruhman & Nahum, 2019Brian Skinner, Jonathan Ruhman, Adam Nahum
Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement
Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031009
Toker & al., 2022D. Toker, et al.
Consciousness is supported by near-critical slow cortical electrodynamics
PNAS doi:10.1073/pnas.2024455119
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024455119

References

Pribram, 1991
K. H. Pribram
Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing
1991
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Kastner, 2012
Ruth Kastner
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: The Reality of Possibility
2012
Cambridge Univ. Pr.

Fisher, 2015
Matthew Fisher
Quantum cognition: the possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain
2015
Ann. Phys., 362, pp. 593-602
Google Scholar

Li, 2018
Yaodong Li, Xiao Chen, Matthew P. A. Fisher
Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition
2018
Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136
Google Scholar

Toker, 2022
D. Toker, et al.
Consciousness is supported by near-critical slow cortical electrodynamics
2022
PNAS doi:10.1073/pnas.2024455119
Google Scholar

Cramer, 1986
J. Cramer
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
1986
Rev. of Mod. Phys. 58(3) 647–688

Chan, 2019
A. Chan, et al.
Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics
2019
arXiv:1808.05949

King, 1989
C. King
Dual-Time Supercausality
1989
Physics. Essays 2/2 128-151.

Shine, 2018
James M. Shine, et al.
The modulation of neural gain facilitates a transition between functional segregation and integration in the brain
2018
eLife
Google Scholar

Beggs, 2023
John Beggs
When does the brain operate at peak performance?
2023
Quanta Magazine
Google Scholar

Bettinger, 2017
Jesse Sterling Bettinger
Comparative approximations of criticality in a neural and quantum regime
2017
Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 131:445-462
Google Scholar

Qasim, 2021
Salman E. Qasim, Itzhak Fried, Joshua Jacobs
Phase precession in the human hippocampus and entorhinal cortex
2021
Cell 184(12):3242-55
Google Scholar

Kim, 2001
Jaegwon Kim
Mental Causation and Consciousness: The Two Mind-Body Problems for the Physicalist
2001
In Physicalism and Its Discontents, edited by Carl Gillett and Barry Loewer, 271-283. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Skarda, 1987
C. Skarda, W. Freeman
How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world
1987
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 161-195

Gallego, 2021
M. Gallego, B. Dakić
Macroscopically Nonlocal Quantum Correlations
2021
Phys. Rev Lett. 127, 120401

Skinner, 2019
Brian Skinner, Jonathan Ruhman, Adam Nahum
Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement
2019
Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009
Google Scholar

Shriki, 2023
Oren Shriki, et al.
Neuronal Avalanches in the Resting MEG of the Human Brain
2023
Journal of Neuroscience, 33 (16) 7079-7090
Google Scholar

King, 2021
C. King
Symbiotic Existential Cosmology
2021
ReearchGate [Preprint]
Google Scholar

O’Byrne, 2022
J. O’Byrne, K. Jerbi
How critical is brain criticality?
2022
Trends in Neurosciences 45/11

King, 1978
C. King
Unified Field Theories and the Origin of Life
1978
Ak. Univ. Math. Reps.
Google Scholar